In the past twenty years hundreds of infants and young children have died after being left in vehicles, usually by accident. When turning the vehicle off, drivers of the CR-V are reminded to check the back seat if they opened the rear door before starting out. The Corsair doesn’t offer a back seat reminder.
Using vehicle speed sensors and seat sensors, smart airbags in the CR-V deploy with different levels of force or don’t deploy at all to help better protect passengers of all sizes in different collisions. The CR-V’s side airbags will shut off if a child is leaning against the door. The Corsair’s side airbags don’t have smart features and will always deploy full force.
In a Vehicle-to-Vehicle Frontal Crash Prevention 2.0 test conducted by the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety (IIHS), the Honda CR-V achieved a “Acceptable” rating - the second highest possible - for its performance in forward collision warning and automatic braking systems, demonstrating its excellent capabilities in preventing collisions. The Lincoln Corsair has not been tested.
When descending a steep, off-road slope, the CR-V’s standard Hill Descent Control allows you to creep down safely. The Corsair doesn’t offer Hill Descent Control.
Both the CR-V and the Corsair have standard driver and passenger frontal airbags, front and rear side-impact airbags, driver and front passenger knee airbags, side-impact head airbags, front wheel drive, height adjustable front shoulder belts, four-wheel antilock brakes, traction control, electronic stability systems to prevent skidding, crash mitigating brakes, daytime running lights, lane departure warning systems, rearview cameras, driver alert monitors, available all-wheel drive, blind spot warning systems, rear parking sensors and rear cross-path warning.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does 35 MPH front crash tests on new vehicles. In this test, results indicate that the Honda CR-V is safer than the Lincoln Corsair:
|
|
CR-V |
Corsair |
|
|
Driver |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| Neck Injury Risk |
17.1% |
22.5% |
| Neck Stress |
181 lbs. |
185 lbs. |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
The National Highway Traffic Safety Administration does side impact tests on new vehicles. In this test, which crashes the vehicle into a flat barrier at 38.5 MPH and into a post at 20 MPH, results indicate that the Honda CR-V is safer than the Lincoln Corsair:
|
|
CR-V |
Corsair |
|
|
Front Seat |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
72 |
197 |
| Chest Movement |
.8 inches |
.9 inches |
| Abdominal Force |
115 lbs. |
191 lbs. |
|
|
Rear Seat |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
71 |
97 |
| Hip Force |
613 lbs. |
816 lbs. |
|
|
Into Pole |
|
| STARS |
5 Stars |
5 Stars |
| HIC |
302 |
344 |
New test not comparable to pre-2011 test results. More stars = Better. Lower test results = Better.
Side impacts caused 23% of all road fatalities in 2018, down from 29% in 2003, when the Insurance Institute for Highway Safety introduced its side barrier test. In order to continue improving vehicle safety, the IIHS has started using a more severe side impact test: 37 MPH (up from 31 MPH), with a 4180-pound barrier (up from 3300 pounds). The results of this newly developed test demonstrates that the Honda CR-V is much safer than the Corsair:
|
|
CR-V |
Corsair |
| Overall Evaluation |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
| Structure |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
|
|
Driver Injury Measures |
|
| Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Head Injury Criterion |
138 |
391 |
| Head Peak Forces |
no contact |
93 G’s |
| Neck Tension |
178 lbs. |
379 lbs. |
| Torso |
ACCEPTABLE |
MARGINAL |
| Shoulder Deflection |
.91 in |
1.1 in |
| Shoulder Force |
201 lbs. |
223 lbs. |
| Torso Max Deflection |
1.3 in |
1.77 in |
| Torso Deflection Rate |
7 MPH |
8 MPH |
| Pelvis |
ACCEPTABLE |
MARGINAL |
| Pelvis Force |
1093 lbs. |
1160 lbs. |
| Head Protection |
GOOD |
MARGINAL |
|
|
Passenger Injury Measures |
|
| Head/Neck |
GOOD |
GOOD |
| Head Injury Criterion |
119 |
168 |
| Neck Tension |
45 lbs. |
201 lbs. |
| Torso |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
| Shoulder Deflection |
.94 in |
1.54 in |
| Shoulder Force |
223 lbs. |
379 lbs. |
| Torso Max Deflection |
1.06 in |
1.5 in |
| Pelvis |
GOOD |
ACCEPTABLE |
| Pelvis Force |
759 lbs. |
1093 lbs. |
| Head Protection |
GOOD |
GOOD |
Instrumented handling tests conducted by the National Highway Traffic Safety Administration and analysis of its dimensions indicate that the CR-V is 1.4% to 1.9% less likely to roll over than the Corsair.

